Negotiating With Moscow Would Be Capitulation – Ukraine Presidency – The Moscow Times

Negotiating With Moscow Would Be Capitulation – Ukraine Presidency - The Moscow Times

“There has to be a mutual recognition that military victory is probably in the true sense of the word maybe not achievable through military means,” top U.S. General Mark Milley said earlier this month, estimating that there is “a window of opportunity for negotiation.”

According to Podolyak, Moscow has not made “any direct proposal” to Kyiv for peace talks, preferring to transmit them through intermediaries and even raising the possibility of a ceasefire.

Negotiating ‘makes no sense’

Kyiv sees such talk as mere maneuvering by the Kremlin to win some respite on the ground and prepare a new offensive.

“Russia doesn’t want negotiations. Russia is conducting a communication campaign called ‘negotiations’,” the Ukraine presidential adviser said.

“It will simply stall for time. In the meantime, it will train its mobilized forces, find additional weapons” and fortify its positions,” he warned.

Despite Russia’s heavy military defeats in recent weeks, including Ukraine retaking the key southern city of Kherson, President Vladimir Putin still thinks “he can destroy Ukraine, this is his obsession” and negotiating with him “makes no sense,” Podolyak argued. 

The West cannot pressurize Ukraine into negotiations, he insisted.

“Our partners still think that it is possible to return to the pre-war era when Russia is a reliable partner.”

Following massive Russian withdrawals from the Kyiv region in March, then from the Kharkiv region in the northeast in September, the liberation of Kherson this month marked a “fundamental” turning point in the conflict, according to Podolyak.

Spurred on by its string of military victories, Ukraine can “afford no pause” in its counteroffensive, despite the arrival of winter cold and snow that make the situation on the ground more difficult. 

“Today, even a little pause just adds to the losses suffered by Ukraine,” said the official.

Longer-range missiles

Moscow has been shelling the country’s energy infrastructure for weeks, plunging millions of homes into darkness. 

The regions of Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine and Lugansk in the east are now the “key directions” for the army, Podolyak said, while refusing to speculate on the possibility of a military operation to retake the Crimean peninsula, which Moscow annexed back in 2014. 

Ukrainian authorities are calling for an increase in Western arms deliveries, which is “very important” in winter, he added.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak used his first visit to Kyiv on Saturday to offer a major new air defense package, including 125 anti-aircraft guns.

“We still need 150 to 200 tanks, about 300 armored vehicles,” a hundred artillery systems, 50-70 multiple rocket launcher systems, including the formidable American HIMARS, of which Ukraine already has several units, as well as “10 to 15 anti-aircraft defense systems to close the sky,” said Podolyak. 

He also cited U.S. ATACMS missiles, which have a range of 300 kilometers (185 miles). The range of the weapons currently available to Ukraine barely exceeds 80 kilometers. 

For Podolyak, such missiles would “bring the end of the war closer” by allowing Ukraine to “destroy large Russian military depots” located deep in occupied areas which are currently inaccessible.

Kyiv “doesn’t need” to attack military targets inside Russia, the adviser said. 

“The war will end when we regain control of our borders and when Russia is afraid of Ukraine.” 

This content was originally published here.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *